CapBag

TEST

 

 
Aboma+Keboma, TNO and TÜV judging positive:


Aboma Keboma TNO and the German TÜV are of the opinion that the Suprotek protective caps enlarge safety at the workplace. The Suprotek protective caps have undergone a vertical-shock test in which a falling object 105 kilograms of weight used from 4 meters height.

Showing: the item remained intact and the collapse of energy that was released was fully contained by the protective shell, partly because there is a steel plate in the cap has been processed.

This means that the chance of injury is significantly reduced, this will ultimately translate into less absenteeism and lower costs for the employer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OSHA

Use the proper instructions

 


Capping of reinforcing iron to prevent impalement is required by 1926.701(b) which states that all protruding reinforcing steel, onto and into which employees could fall, shall be guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement. Federal OSHA has interpreted this standard to emphasize the effectiveness of the protection.

Impalement protection is provided by lumber supported by systems such as by Steel high density polymer reinforced caps.

Capping of reinforcing iron to prevent impalement is required by 1926.701(b) which states that all protruding reinforcing steel, onto and into which employees could fall, shall be guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement.

Federal OSHA has interpreted this standard to emphasize the effectiveness of the protection.
“When employees are working at any height above exposed rebar, fall protection/prevention is the first line of defense against impalement. Fall protection/prevention is also applicable when the rebar is below grade, e.g., footings or other excavations, where a fall into a trench would present an impalement hazard. When work is at grade, impalement exposure is dependent upon numerous situations and conditions; proximity of rebar to worker, height of rebar, e.g., working around rebar that is 3-6 feet high would not likely pose an impalement hazard. Rebar caps/covers are appropriate to prevent cuts, abrasions or other minor injuries when working at grade and there is no impalement hazard.
 

California regulations require that manufactured caps be at least 4 inches on a side or have a diameter of 4.5 inches if rounded. Any damaged cap of support system, including any that have arrested a fall, must be replaced immediately. Smaller “mushroom” caps do not provide impalement protection but may be used on horizontal rebar to prevent abrasions, cuts and minor injuries and to increase visibility.  Maintaining supplies of caps and/or supports throughout the site encourages their immediate use. Mushroom caps used on horizontal rebar should be of a different color from caps used to prevent impalement to facilitate usage control. Rebar may also be bent over so that it no longer presents an impalement hazard.

Regular use of rebar caps is enhanced by worker training and by maintaining supplies of capping systems or caps in all areas of the worksite where rebar is in place.

Regular use of rebar caps is enhanced by worker training and by maintaining supplies of capping systems or caps in all areas of the worksite where rebar is in place.

Impalement from falling onto protruding rebar. Caps may also provide protection from cuts and scratches.

Properly designed rebar caps, as described in the CalOSHA standard, spread the force generated by a falling body through a large enough area that impalement should not occur.  Other serious injuries may occur.
Quality of Evidence
  • Manufacturers, vendors, or worksites have reported a risk reduction.
  • Safety and health experts believe there is a risk reduction.

Standard is based on OSHA and industry experience.

Minimal cost and time to install is greatly offset by preventing productivity losses from injuries. 

OSHA and construction industry professional judgement.

No specific calculation ROI information exists for this particular solution, however, there are some general approaches that might be useful for a “Return On Investment” analysis. For a general discussion of these approaches, visit our “Return on Investment Calculation” page.

Rebar caps can reduce the worst injuries from falls onto rebar.  Primary methods to to prevent falls and to arrest falls that occur must be used as required.

 

 

Safety on site


Protective cover
for rebar


Rebar can cause nasty injuries and in the worst cases even life threatening.

In practice, rebar often protected with plastic cups, Styrofoam pieces, or the 'mushrooms'. This might initially appear intact or scratches, but in case of serious emergencies such offer no protection. In the United States is the protection of rebar compulsory. . If someone seriously injured in a fall on the site for the minutes used in the legislation generic form of Article 312 of the act or Arbo-Risk Assessment and Evaluation Requirement. So far so good protection often depends on individual initiative. Thus, BAM Building on two projects recently screened the spot ends with the guards for a British client who requires the protection claimed.

The Suprotek protective plastic caps are entitled to a rotating movement and the rebar can be confirmed. They are available in two variants. The 110 has a square platform and is suitable for cutting ends of 8 to 18 mm. The 200 has a plateau around and fit rebar from 20 to 45 mm. A third implementation, D10, is designed for horizontal thrust security rebar with diameters of 8 to 18 mm. The caps are on the inside with four terminal plates that hold the reinforcement bar. While the inside is not damaged, the cap can be used repeatedly.

In drop tests, conducted by TNO Aboma + Keboma and that the guards a significant contribution to safety on the site. It had a height of four meters weighing 105 kg on the caps fall. During this drop the caps remained intact. The valenergie released by the plastic cap included, partly because a steel plate is included. The caps are on the bright color in which they are implemented. Thus, the rebar clearly identifiable both on the ground and from the tap. This alone is an important aspect that accidents and mishaps occur.

Such accidents are regular at work, often with unpleasant consequences: the employee suffers an injury, the employer costs due to absenteeism. The Suprotek guards are designed to accidents at the construction site and thus reduce the morbidity and bring absenteeism costs down.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructions.

 

There are safety courses implemented in nearly every workplace that involve hazardous materials or environments, from rebar safety, to chemical reaction, to fire procedure just to name a few. Every worker initiated into the job is required to take part in health and safety tutorials, emergency procedure, or lockout videos as part of their introduction. Health and safety boards all over the world have made this function mandatory.

Rebar Safety
Rebar Safety

The construction site presents numerous reasons for safety information to be introduced at the beginning of any job. Rebar safety is a good example of this. The dangers of working with steel, rebar protector caps protecting from impalement, and physical stress from manual rebar labor are just starting points. Rebar safety goes far beyond these necessary examples.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RIGHT

WRONG

 

 

 

 

 

Rebar safety videos can cover anything from proper scaffolding usage and placement to accidental fall emergency procedure, while informing workers of the dangers of rebar steel bars to not only themselves, but to passing pedestrians as well. And because rebar safety issues are so pertinent to a construction zone, they can be cross-platform taught in other areas of relative environment. Every worker on a construction site needs to be informed of all the dangers around him or her at all times.

 

 

 

© Copyright Rebarr international 2011